Dan Gillmor asks a lots of questions in We the Media about the future of journalism. In Chapter 6 he raises an issue that has immediate relevance for me at this very moment. As a journalism student (graduating next semster) I am constantly questioning the efficacy of my education. Perhaps efficacy is not exactly the right word, but what I mean to say is: I wonder whether my degree will actually get me a job!
Broadcast journalism is such a cut throat industry, and is so difficult to break into, I wonder if what I learn every day in the halls of Dwight Bental will actually translate to a job out in the “real world” of media. Teachers like Steve Sloan are fighting to give young journalists the tools they need to compete in Web 2.0 world, which we should thank him for. When I try to get a job I know that I will at least have the ability to create a website, upload content online, blog, podcast, vlog, and use industry standard programs like PhotoShop and InDesign. Like Gillmor points out, many other aspiring journalists do not have these skills.
“The fact is that journalism schools are the main source of new staff. But we can’t allow them to crank out a new generation of reporters, editors, photographers, and broadcasters who don’t understand and appreciate how the profession has changed,” (pg. 131).
Too often students shrug off the skills we have learned in Jour 96e as geeky, or too hard to understand. They ask “why do I need to know that?” Administrators who are stuck behind the times also question whether these skills should be a priority. The answer is they are absolutely critical.
Gillmor says teaching students a combination of new reporting skills and traditional staples like investigative techniques will lead to “multidirectional” journalists. In the world of New Media, multidirectional will quickly become infinite-directional, and I can only hope to have good peripheral vision if I want to keep up.